|
You are in: Products >
Chlorophyll Fluorescence
> Pulse Modulated
How does a Modulated Chlorophyll Fluorometer Measure Chlorophyll Fluorescence?
A modulated chlorophyll fluorometer uses sophisticated electronics to separate
chlorophyll fluorescence from ambient light. The systems achieve this using a
rapid pulsing excitation light in order to induce a corresponding pulsed
fluorescence emission. The fluorometer uses a highly sensitive photodiode to
detect and record the pulsed fluorescence signal and to ignore any non-pulsed
signal.
At physiological temperatures peak fluorescence emission occurs in the red
region of the spectrum ( 685 nm) and extends into the infra-red region to around
800 nm (Krause and Weiss 1984) as shown in the diagram below.
Accurate determination of fluorescence requires a detection system which is
sensitive to fluorescence wavelengths yet blind to the actinic (or excitation)
light which drives photochemistry. In continuous excitation instruments such as
the Handy PEA and Pocket PEA, signal discrimination is achieved using a custom
designed 650nm actinic light source to drive photochemistry; optical filtering
of the detector prevents detection of non-fluorescence wavelengths of light.
Unfortunately such systems must be shielded from ambient light during use,
otherwise the red / far-red component of day-light will be super-imposed on the
fluorescence signal.
This problem is avoided by a modulated chlorophyll fluorometer as it uses an
electronic method, commonly referred to as pulse modulation, to separate actinic
light from the fluorescence signal (Ögren and Baker 1985). During measurement
the tissue sample is exposed to a pulsed amber (or optional blue) LED light
source (the modulating beam) which induces a pulsed fluorescence signal from the
sample under conditions where ambient light is excluded. When ambient light is
applied, the optical filtering of the system allows three types of light signal
to reach the detector:
| |
Ambient light of fluorescence wavelengths.
|
| |
Non-pulsed fluorescence signal induced by the ambient light.
|
| |
Pulsed fluorescence signal induced by the modulating beam.
|
Addition of ambient light changes the physiology of the sample, altering the
proportion of energy that is re-emitted as fluorescence. Thus the magnitude of
the peaks of the pulsed fluorescence signal that are induced by the modulating
beam will reflect changes in sample physiology. It is these signals that the
rapid pulse peak tracking electronics amplify and measure; ambient and
non-pulsed fluorescence signal are discarded.
|
The diagram opposite shows the fluorescence signal detected by the FMS 1 and FMS
2 modulated chlorophyll fluorometers under modulating beam only conditions (A),
under actinic light plus modulating beam before (B) and after (C)
the rapid pulse peak tracking electronics. The pulsed fluorescence that is
induced by the modulation beam is effectively used to probe the efficiency of
light-use for photosystem II photochemistry. Clearly it is important that the
measuring technique itself does not induce changes in the physiology of the
sample under investigation.
|
Exposure of a sample to a powerful pulsed light source may be expected to
introduce a significant artefact into the measurement. However, Hansatech
Instruments modulated chlorophyll fluorometers have been specifically designed
to avoid such problems by using a modulating beam of very short duration pulses
(1.8 µsec) with long off period between pulses. The net result is that the
integrated amount of radiation incident upon the sample from the modulating beam
is very small (approx. <0.05µmol m-2 s-1), too small to
induce significant physiological change in the sample (Schreiber et al. 1986*),
yet powerful enough to provide a reliable signal for fluorescence analysis.
The interpretation of fluorescence signals has developed considerably since the
early experiments of Kautsky and Hirsch (1931)** with several techniques
employed to determine information about the photosynthetic performance of PSII
(Baker 1991***). Hansatech Instruments modulated chlorophyll fluorometers have
been designed to incorporate these techniques into simple routines which store
appropriate chlorophyll fluorescence measurements and automatically calculate
key parameters.
* Schreiber, U., Schliwa, W. and U. Bilger (1986). Continuous recording of
photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a
new type of modulation fluorimeter. Photosynthesis Research, 10, 51-62.
** Kautsky, H. and A. Hirsch (1931). Chlorophyllfluoreszenz und
Kohlensäureassimilation. Naturwissenschaften, 19, 964.
*** Baker, N.R., (1991). A possible role for photosystem II in environmental
perturbations of photosynthesis. Physiologia Plantarum, 81, 563-570.
|